<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Space Sector &#187; unique tech trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacesector.com/blog/tag/unique-tech-trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacesector.com/blog</link>
	<description>Everything about Space and Sci-Fi Strategy Games. Turn Based Strategy, Real Time Strategy, Massively Multiplayer Online, 4x. Reviews, Previews, News, Interviews, Discussions and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Brad Ottoson &#124; Aphelion: Phoenix Rising main Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacesector.com/blog/2009/11/interview-with-brad-ottoson-aphelion-phoenix-rising-main-developer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.spacesector.com/blog/2009/11/interview-with-brad-ottoson-aphelion-phoenix-rising-main-developer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Solo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4x game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced terraforming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aphelion Phoenix Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artifacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random techs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactical space combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turn based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique tech trees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacesector.com/blog/?p=888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In September 26th I wrote a post about a new space strategy game in the making called <em><a title="Aphelion: Phoenix Rising" href="http://wyvernstudios.net/" target="_blank">Aphelion: Phoenix Rising</a></em>. You can read the post here: <a title="Aphelion Phoenix Rising: A new 4x Space Strategy Game under Development" href="http://www.spacesector.com/blog/2009/09/aphelion-phoenix-rising-%E2%80%93-a-new-4x-space-strategy-game-under-development/" target="_blank">Aphelion Phoenix Rising: A new 4x Space Strategy Game under Development</a>.

By then Brad Ottoson (main developer) told me that<em>“[Aphelion] won’t be out for a few years still but we have a lot of it done”. <span style="font-style: normal;">Having liked what I saw and after having a nice chat with Brad I decided to invite Brad for an interview which he kindly accepted. Here is the interview we did. I hope you enjoy it as much as I have.</span></em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">In September 26th I wrote a post about a new space strategy game in the making called <em><a title="Aphelion: Phoenix Rising" href="http://wyvernstudios.net/" target="_blank">Aphelion: Phoenix Rising</a></em>. You can read the post here: <a title="Aphelion Phoenix Rising: A new 4x Space Strategy Game under Development" href="http://www.spacesector.com/blog/2009/09/aphelion-phoenix-rising-%E2%80%93-a-new-4x-space-strategy-game-under-development/" target="_blank">Aphelion Phoenix Rising: A new 4x Space Strategy Game under Development</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">By then Brad Ottoson (main developer) told me that<em>“[Aphelion] won’t be out for a few years still but we have a lot of it done”. <span style="font-style: normal;">Having liked what I saw and after having a nice chat with Brad I decided to invite Brad for an interview which he kindly accepted. Here is the interview we did. I hope you enjoy it as much as I have.</span></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>1. In Aphelion: Phoenix Rising (APR) <a title="Aphelion: Phoenix Rising" href="http://wyvernstudios.net/" target="_blank">website</a></strong><strong> you introduce the game Races. To help people connect and know a bit more about APR could you make a small preview of the game background story?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Essentially most the races are interconnected in someway. We don&#8217;t want  to say to much, otherwise we&#8217;ll be giving away the plot that will unfold  during gameplay so we can tell you the basics. Essentially everything  started with an event in the past in which a Brown dwarf (Solar system  isn&#8217;t old enough for it to exist yet) appears out of now were and is in  a collision course with Sol&#8217;s sun, roughly 100 years in the future from  now. The collision will create a supernova when the Brown dwarf&#8217;s  gravity sucks the hydrogen from the Sun and it explosively fuses all the  hydrogen from the sun in one massive fusion reaction, destroying the  solar system.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The governments of earth all band together to create 3  embryo ships to carry humanity elsewhere. These are named the Pinta, the  Nina and the Santa Maria and bring with them storage devices, detailing  all of earth technologies. Each ship takes off in different direction in  hopes of finding a suitable planet to colonize using powerful sub light  speed drives. The story continues, thousands of years in the future when an empire  created from the survivors of the Pinta emerges. The Pinta arrived at  it&#8217;s destination a few thousand years late, this was due to the fact  that it sustained substantial damage to it&#8217;s engines from space debris,  slowing it speed. The Pintar began to explore the galaxy and encounter 5 other distinct  races. They encounter the Therans who are a peaceful aquatic race who  are naive. As a result the Therans are easy marks at first to other  races as they are caught unprepared to violence and greed that other  exhibit. Also encountered are the Greys. They are an unique species with  fragile bodies and massive intellect, but unfortunately for them they  are rather irrational and unfocused in their thinking. The Pintar view  the Greys with suspicion, because rumors have it that the Grey&#8217;s  technology gives off readings similar to those that were detected when  the Brown dwarf appeared in the past and it is felt they had some part  in it. They also encounter the Vitruvians, who are a cybernetic race.  This is not by choice though as in the past their race was infected by a  complex and deadly infection that they named &#8220;the sickness&#8221;. &#8220;The  sickness&#8221; bonded with their DNA and became part of them. As time  progress the nature of &#8220;the sickness&#8221; mutated and began to create  congenital problems their organs. As a result, they became experts at  replacing vital organs with mechanical ones, prolonging their lives  while a cure is created. Progress has been mixed and it is unknown if  they will ever reverse the damage to become &#8220;pure&#8221; again, but they have  been successful at creating treatments to slow the mutation of &#8220;the  sickness&#8221;, prolonging the survival of their species.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://wyvernstudios.net/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-899" title="Aphelion: Phoenix Rising" src="http://www.spacesector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/apr21.JPG" alt="Aphelion: Phoenix Rising" width="192" height="271" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The next two  species encountered had an interconnected past. The subterranean Atton  and the insect-like Atrox had fought on opposite sides in an ancient  galaxy wide war in the past. The Atton were allied with the &#8220;Precursors&#8221;  who they worshiped as gods. Both were losers in the battle when the  Atton were beaten back and all but exterminated when their planet&#8217;s  surface was vaporized in a massive nuclear holocaust. They continued by  living underground for countless years until the lingering radiation on  the planet&#8217;s surface dissipated. They Blame the Atrox for this  apocalyptic event and vow vengeance. The Atrox were beat back in a  series of massive battles till they were isolated on their home planet.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The &#8220;Precursors&#8221; in a stroke of tactical genius, altered the course of a  planet in their solar system to create a never ending eclipse of the  Atrox home world. This rapidly cooled the planet and froze the Atrox in  an icy grave. This recently has been undone though, as a massive  asteroid has struck the eclipsing planet and altered its course, thawing  the Atrox and releasing them back upon the galaxy. Curiously the Atrox  and the Atton share Some DNA and show signs of DNA manipulation within  their genetics, the Atrox more so than the Atton. There is little record  of the &#8220;Precursors&#8221; in historic documents after the sealing of the Atrox  within their prison. It is thought that they left the galaxy to search  out a new galaxy to start anew. The Atton await the return of their gods  and focus their efforts and religion on reconnecting with them.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>2. In the website you mention that the APR Races will have their &#8220;own individual tech tree, that is unique to them&#8221;. Does this mean that there will be different specific techs (different bonuses, requirements, special abilities) for each race or just a different combination (tech path) of the total number of techs available to all the races? You also mentioned that the tech trees are somewhat randomly generated in each game. Could you explain a bit more how it works?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Yes, all the technologies for each race are completely specific to that  race and are not shared with any other race. These technologies reflect  each race and give each a distinct feel. To give an example, the Atton  are a faction that is controlled by an authoritarian government centered  on their beliefs. Many of their &#8220;system&#8221; technologies revolve around  religious decrees. In addition they are distinct as they are the only  faction to lack any form of shielding for their spaceships. In contrast,  the Vitruvians are a cybernetic race and much of their &#8220;system&#8221;  technologies revolve around increasing society efficiency by joining  their consciousness. Also the Vitruvians are quite reliant on shielding  technologies to protect their ships, and are equipped with the minimal  armor.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>3. You also mention that players will be able to colonize planets according to their terraforming capabilities, and that will depend on the right level of terraforming technology. Does this mean that the player will be allowed to colonize every planet or does he/she need to unlock some specific techs first?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">There will be a variety of different planets within our game much like  there is in the real universe. These will range from Irradiated planets  in a semi locked orbit such as Mercury is, to frozen wastelands such as  Pluto. Obviously some planets such as these on the extreme ranges of the  spectrum could not be terraformed regardless of technological knowhow.  In our game we will have inhabitable planet classes such as Barren,  Swamp, Oceanic, Arid, and Terrain. These planets will be colonizable  without any further terraformation and will support population dependent  on class and size. The Therans will receive an additional population  bonus on Oceanic planets since they are an amphibious race and can  thrive in water. Terraformable planets are either too hot to sustain any substantial  amount of life such as desert planets, or conversely too cold such as  Arctic and Arctic Desert planets. To colonize these planets, the player  must first research specific technologies that allow them to terraform  these planets. The technologies will be either &#8220;warming&#8221; technologies  for the Arctic and Arctic desert planets or, &#8220;cooling&#8221; technologies for  Desert planets. Each planet will have a specific level of technological  difficulty to terraform. These are represented by &#8220;tick&#8221; marks and each  planet can have up to 7 levels. Conversely each technology will allow  the player to terraform a number of levels alone. These technologies can  be combined together to terraform more difficult planets. An example  would be if you had a desert planet with that needed four levels of  terraforming. To terraform this planet you may have to combine a  technology that cools a planet two levels with two additional  technologies that cool a single level apiece. At this point the planet  would slowly be terraformed over a certain number of turns depending on  it&#8217;s size and technologies used, and will become one of the habitable  planet types in the end. Technologies used to terraform cost resources  in the form of alloy and Galactic credit&#8217;s. Not all technologies are  equal and some are faster, or more resource efficient than others. As  mentioned before, not all planets are terraformable. Irradiated, Frozen  core, Volcanic and and Gas giant planets fall in this class of planets.  This does not mean they are worthless since many structures that you  build in you system are dependent on these classes of planets and could  not be built otherwise.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>4. You mentioned to me previously that APR is inspired by various 4x space strategy games like Master of Orion 2 and StarTrek: Birth of the Federation. Taking this into consideration in which aspects will APR innovate the genre and why should the fans be looking forward for APR?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Our original goal was to make a game very similar to Birth of the  Federation with new graphics, since we were frustrated that no one had  came out with a proper sequel. We then stood back and thought &#8220;what was  great about this game&#8221; and &#8220;what did it not do that well&#8221;. What we  thought was great was the layout for planets and the main exploration  screen. BOTF&#8217;s planet management was nice in the fact that you managed  systems as a whole instead of individual planets, this allowed you to  manage many more planets then the typical per planet way. This allowed  you the feeling of managing a massive empire without the headaches of  actually having to manage every aspect of a massive empire. We felt one  of the weaknesses of MOO2 was that you had to build the exact same  structures on every planet of your system and couldn&#8217;t manage them as a  whole.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">What we did find that MOO2 did better than BOTF was primary their  Tactical combat system. In Birth of the Federation, you built a fleet  and then had them battle with an enemy fleet in a battle royal. Though  options for tactical maneuvers existed, the most of the time the best  tactics ended up being limited to charging in and firing all your  weapons at opposing ships. This went against the core gameplay for a  turn based strategy game. MOO2 on the other hand allowed the player to  move each ship independently and to maneuver to present their least  exposed side to the enemy while trying to focus firepower on one  quadrant of the enemies. This was exceptionally strategic and plays the  core gameplay that our fans enjoy. So we chose to have a style similar  to MOO2 in that aspect with a top down view on a grid battle map where  each ship in maneuvered individually.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">We have innovated and expanded gameplay in many area&#8217;s within our game.  As mentioned before, we have a unique method for players to terraform  planets and research technology. We also like to give the players  choices throughout the game, and many times throughout the tech tree the  player will have to choose one technological branch over another.  Players will not be able to research both branches in these instances.  Another instance where we will infuse choice into the game is during  events. These can be triggered many ways. Often the player will be given  a situation where they must choose one action over another, and the  outcomes are not set in place. Often what was determined to be the right  choice in one game, brings an entirely different outcome in another game.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In addition we have added much to espionage within our game. Players  will train spies and maintain a pool of them. To perform tasks, a player  will choose an action and send a spy on a mission. After a certain  number of turns this task will come to completion. For each mission  there are a vast number of outcomes that can happen, such as the agent  could successfully complete his mission and then succeed in implicating  another faction in the deed. This would lower that player&#8217;s trust rating  and cause the friendliness rating between the 2 factions to fall. On the  opposite end of the spectrum, your agent could fail and become captured  and turned into a double agent. If this happens, you will be notified  that your agent failed at his mission and has returned. Any operations  following this action will be severely compromised until your spy agency  uncovers that there is a traitor. In addition, if your moral is  faltering, you can send agents to perform operations to silence critics  within your empire, raising morale. Nothing is without consequences  though, and these operations could fail and backfire.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">One area which we felt was often neglected within our genre that we wish  to improve on, is ground combat. In APR, we decided we wanted to  implement an engaging, yet brief ground combat system. We did this  because we wanted to add more depth to the game, yet we didn&#8217;t want to  drag the game to a crawl by adding a long in depth battle system which  would force other player to wait, while other completed. Our combat  system will be engaging and entertaining and the outcome will not be  completely predetermined, leaving some suspense. Mostly this will be  based on each player&#8217;s choices prior to combat. It will also take into  account, technologies researched, building built and population for the  defending side and numbers of transports used by the attacking side. To help the story line progress, many random events will occur  throughout that will uncover portions of the past to give back story. In  addition, while exploring the galaxy, players will uncover artifacts on  planets that will give bonuses and back story as well. As the galaxy is  essentially completely explored by mid game, we devised a way to extend  this exploration portion by allowing players to form expeditions to  explore inhospitable planets in search of artifacts and secret  laboratories. To do this, players must research specific technologies  that will enable exploration parties for specific planet types. An  example of this would be ultra high pressure exploration vessels for gas  giant exploration.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">APR is built on what we feel are the strong points of our favorite  games, but it has grown to be unique on it&#8217;s own, with far to many  innovations to list. What I have listed above are just a few of things  that players can look forward to.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>5. Will APR provide multiplayer capabilities? Hot-seat, LAN support?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">APR can be played over the internet with any extra seats being  controlled by AIs. Players on a LAN can play, though LAN players will  have to connect to the matchmaking server though the internet to start  the game. There will not be a hotseat mode in the game.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>6. When do you plan to release a playable demo?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">We haven&#8217;t decided to release a playable demo yet. We&#8217;re still weighing  the pros and cons of doing so, such as the time required to produce it vs the  increased interest it could generate.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>7. For which platforms are you planning to release for? Will this include Mac?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The platforms we initially release on will most likely depend on our  publishing arrangement when the game is complete. The game source code  is occasionally compiled and run on a computer running Linux, and we  expect there won&#8217;t be many problems getting it to run on Macs.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>8. And by mentioning APR release. In September 2009 you mention to me that APR &#8220;won&#8217;t be out for a few years still but we have a lot of it done&#8221;. In the site&#8217;s forum</strong><strong>, in a 2006 <a title="Aphelion: Phoenix Rising Forum" href="http://wyvernstudios.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3" target="_blank">post</a> you mention 2011 as the release date. Is this still the target for APR release?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Much depends on if we receive outside funding through a publisher or  other outside source. While this would certainly speed up APR&#8217;s  development, we are unwilling to sign a publishing deal just for the  sake of getting funding. If we must continue to finish the game on our  own it may take longer than we anticipated, but we are willing take do  this route if needed. Everyday brings us closer to completion and  progress has been steady. So far we have not gotten any bids on Jared&#8217;s  left kidney, but we are still hopeful.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Thank you for your time Brad.</strong></p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spacesector.com/blog/2009/11/interview-with-brad-ottoson-aphelion-phoenix-rising-main-developer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/18 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 263/308 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.spacesector.com @ 2012-02-07 12:13:28 -->
